The problem of “automated” agronomy and in practice Satellite vs. plant sensor

While browsing the LinkedIn platform, I found this interesting picture of Nathan Faleide, an AgTech specialist from the USA, see
https://www.linkedin.com/in/nathan-faleide-036b43b5/

Figure 1: From individual data to automated decision-making.

This illustrates my current experience in the creation of management zone maps (“potential maps”) from multi-year satellite data very well. This is a task that is carried out automatically by various providers. But what is the quality of the maps generated? Every year is different, fields are split and merged, irrigation lines are laid, there are processing and application errors, cloud shadows and much more. In my experience, there are areas where only ONE date has provided a usable image for zoning since the start of the Sentinel-2 flights! For such areas, an ” automated” system provides the mixed entity at the bottom left of the image, and in contrast to this, you can’t even guess which data is responsible for this in the generated map!

An AI also relies on data and learnt knowledge; if these are incorrect, the result will be the same. In computer science, programming an access function for a database is labour-intensive for humans, but a trifle for an AI. Assessing the quality of basic data and arriving at a comprehensible result with the ” correct” agronomic knowledge is much more complex. And then there’s the “battle” over which is the ” correct” agronomic knowledge 😉 .

In practice Satellite vs. plant sensor

The creation of fertiliser maps for our service “N fertilisation according to the measurement of N uptake by satellite in autumn” for winter oilseed rape is in the final phase.

Many of our customers have a YARA N sensor, but do not perform an autumn scan. The reasons for this are the limited operating times of “old” passive sensors in autumn, peak workloads, cost savings for an extra trip or the poor accessibility of the fields. This means, for example, that only a few fields could be scanned, but planning is required for the entire rapeseed area.

An opportunity for us to compare the satellite and plant sensor in practice when recording the parameter N uptake in oilseed rape!

Figure 2: Left: N uptake map derived from satellite images according to EXAgT algorithms, right: interpolated N uptake map from ALS-2 measurements from the Agricon Agriport.

The comparison shows, on the one hand, a comparable level of the measured N uptake values, but also the greater level of detail of the map from satellite data.

The differences lie in the type of measurement. The Sentinel-2 satellite works similarly to a digital camera with a defined resolution such as the 10x10m spectral channels used here.

With the YARA sensor, an average value is calculated from the measurements of each of the two sensor heads (2x 3m measuring width per head). For each track, this one value is used as the default value for the entire working width (36 metres in this case).

Modern centrifugal spreaders have the ability to spread different quantities at least to the left and right, while pneumatic spreaders and sprayers have many individually controllable sections. This means that a higher resolution of the application maps can also be realised within the track.

We create application maps from these values using the tried and tested Rapool algorithm; agricon has its own calculation methods.

Ask us, we look forward to your tasks! We specialise in company-specific solutions, we value you and your challenges =;-).

Our contact details are:

arnim.grabo@exagt.de
+49 (0) 176 72588814, +49 (0) 34324 269737

andreas.schmidt@exagt.de
+49 (0) 173 352 8960, +49 (0) 34324 269739

Posted in Agronomy, Technology | Comments Off on The problem of “automated” agronomy and in practice Satellite vs. plant sensor

Challenges in the autumn satellite scan in late autumn 2023, you can still join!

Since 2017, we have been successfully offering our “N fertilisation according to the measurement of N uptake by satellite in autumn” service for winter oilseed rape and winter wheat/barley/rye. This is based on cloud-free Sentinel-2 satellite measurement data before dormancy and reference measurements of N uptake in the crop.

How was the availability of such data this year? For our customers in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, there was good quality data on 23 October 2023; this was also the case for Eastern Saxony on 30 October 2023.

Figure 1: Sentinel-2 RGB image from 23 October 2023 Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania

This was more difficult in other locations, such as west of Dresden/Erzgebirge. We had carried out our reference measurements on the ground here in late autumn; we were only able to use satellite data from 17.12.2023. Since the cold period at the end of November/beginning of December 2023 had hardly any influence on the crops of oilseed rape/winter cereals, even due to the snow cover, this was possible without any problems!

Figure 2: Sentinel-2 RGB image west of Dresden/Erzgebirge from 09/11/2023 left vs. RGB image from 17/12/2023

The search for cloud-free images of our customers’ fields in Saxony-Anhalt and Thuringia was also very time-consuming this year, and we are proud that we were able to find them for all areas, sometimes through painstaking detective work!

The N-absorption maps and calculation tables have been finalised this week and will be sent to our customers from Monday!

Get on board now!

We now have cloud-free satellite data throughout eastern Germany at the end of 2023 and can now also create N uptake maps for winter oilseed rape and winter cereals and use them as a basis for fertilisation in spring 2024, a spreading map can be created at short notice!

If time is short, fertilise a constant N1a application (also for sulphur supply, see below), the next application can then be differentiated with an application map.

If there were problems with the sensor recordings in autumn, difficulties with the generation of spread maps, if you need personal advice from agronomy to application technology, please contact us!

Ask us, we look forward to your tasks! Our speciality is farm-specific solutions, we value you and your challenges =;-).

Our contact details are:

arnim.grabo@exagt.de

+49 (0) 176 72588814, +49 (0) 34324 269737

andreas.schmidt@exagt.de

+49 (0) 173 352 8960, +49 (0) 34324 269739

Posted in Agronomy, Technology | Comments Off on Challenges in the autumn satellite scan in late autumn 2023, you can still join!

To the new year / News about Project SNaPwürZ

“Fundamentally, it is always the connection with other people that give life its worth.“
Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767 bis 1835)

A heartfelt thank you for your trust and the delightful cooperation.  May your new year be filled with contentment, health, happiness and optimism.  We wish you a merry Christmas and a successfull 2024.

2023 was a very eventful and successful year for us, highlighted by the “DLG-Agrifuture Concept Winner 2023” prize awarded at the agritechnica 2023, which we received as part of the cooperation with our partners AMAZONE, EXA Computing, geo-konzept, Hanse-Agro, the Kiel University of Applied Sciences and the start-up AgDoIT. This award and our involvement in the EIP-Agri project SNaPwürZ set the course for our further increased involvement in the field of OFR/PiG trials for agronomic practice, including methodological developments in the coming year.

The amazing response to our EXAgT Observator during agritechnica 2023 brought us new partners in the field of application and potential further development extending beyond Germany’s borders.

Our developments in the practical application of remote sensing data for agronomic purposes are continuing and we will report on them here.

News about Project SNaPwürZ

Translation: smart, sustainable, precise, repeatable, transferable and resilient – Agriculture under the changing conditions of the future

Chances through digital innovations in On Farm Research and precise trials

The first meeting of the Operational Group (OG) took place on 13 December in the Department of Agricultural Economics at Kiel University of Applied Sciences. A total of 18 people took part in this hybrid event, including OG members, external speakers and guests. The event was characterised by short keynote speeches and open discussions.

Prof Dr Ute Kropf from Kiel University of Applied Sciences kicked off the event with a pitch on field trials at Lindenhof. She focussed on the technical aspects of field trials, and the presence of the trial technicians contributed to an in-depth discussion about the current challenges in planning and implementing precision trials.

Mr Bastian Brandenburg from R&D Centre FH Kiel GmbH gave an insight into the farm knowledge infrastructure as a knowledge transfer platform (www.farmwissen.de). He explained the structure of the infrastructure and how Farmwissen can serve as the main channel for publishing the project results of the OG SNaPwürZ and create a wider reach.

Mr Moritz Gassan from EXAgT GmbH reported on the current status of the experimental guide for on-farm research. Although the project is still at an early stage, the guideline is already well advanced.

Christoph Ratke presented the terms of reference for the on-farm research toolbox, thereby initiating the discussion. This then moved on to practical experimental questions and the challenges in practical agriculture when implementing on-farm experiments. The practitioners present provided important suggestions for overcoming these obstacles and helped to concretise the experimental plans.

Sebastian Ramm, R&D Centre FH Kiel GmbH

Posted in General | Comments Off on To the new year / News about Project SNaPwürZ